Economy balance discussion

[Jenna-X]

(07-11-2018, 09:42 PM)Zephyr Wrote: I think that you misunderstand on your first point.  Player A has a house and $1m.  Nothing else to spend it on so $1m is useless.  But he does need to renew prem.  Player B wants a house.

B sells code to A.  A has spent in game money that he does not value but gained a code that he does.  B has spent $25 to get $400k in game money that is worth more to him than $25.

No I didn't misunderstand anything.  Player B took advantage of player A's cash and spent $25 instead of $50 to get immediate access to a house and have plenty of excess spending money.  Nobody needs a house unless they throw parties.  However, a game subscription was purchased.  It didn't impact the economy, non premium players or premium players.  It does impact those unwilling to spend $25 on a video game for a 3 month sub.  Maybe we should ask if we really care about those who won't spend $25 or should we cater to those unwilling to support the game?