Gaming! Discussion

[Sasso]

(05-23-2016, 11:29 AM)Sharp Wrote: I won't argue with anybody about this, but CoD for me is shambolic. The early ones, yes, but after WoW they have been appalling. The stories get laboured, the Zombies got old pretty quick, and the multiplayer is overrun by 12 year old kids. If you want to see the difference, play Battlefield; CoD players can't play Battlefield, because they are too used to wandering off on their own, and they just get destroyed. But if a Battlefield player goes into a CoD match, they just own everybody, because they play tactically.

I don't mean to insult anyone's taste in games or anything, but I wouldn't go anywhere near a Call of Duty game (except maybe 4, but flash in the pan or however that saying goes). This kind of is for similar reasons why I don't play many new triple A games. I find them boring and repetitive and recycle themselves over and over. Call of Duty is at 13 games, with another coming out in November. This isn't just Call of Duty either. I stopped playing Assasin's Creed halfway though Brotherhood because I got bored of the repeating gameplay that was fun at first, but since then Ubisoft has put out 6 more Assassin's Creed games, not including 11 more spin off and side games, and arguably the only real innovation was from Black Flag, which I might consider playing.

Also Call of Duty or Counter Strike kids walking into Killing Floor as level 0's saying "Don't worry guys I play lots of shooters I know what I'm doing" and getting mulched by Fleshpounds is quite an experience to watch.